Legal Opinion
James William Bishop v. Jim Rose, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 8, 1983No. 82-5256PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LIVELY, Circuit Judge.
In this habeas corpus action the district court found that the State of Tennessee had interferred with the relationship between the petitioner and his attorney to a degree which violated petitioner’s Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel, and directed that he be released unless the state grants him a new trial. We affirm.
I
A
The district court stated the facts as follows:
Facts
In May 1977 petitioner was tried and convicted of second degree murder and grand larceny in connection with the death and robbery of an elderly Wilson County, Tennessee, woman…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sumner v. MataSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Sanborn v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- State v. Osie (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- United States v. MastroianniCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Gerald L. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Leonard B. Steele, (83-5108), Marvin Lee Echols, (83-5109), David A. Warren, (83-5110), Jackie Wayne Scarborough, (83-5111)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.