United States v. Hallmark Construction Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CONLON, District Judge.
The United States of America sues Hallmark Construction Company (“Hallmark”) for allegedly filling a five-acre isolated wetland (“Area B”) without obtaining authorization under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1344. The government seeks restoration of Area B and/or mitigation to address the loss of wetland area. Hallmark argues there is no basis for federal jurisdiction over Area B, the United States is not a proper plaintiff, and the complaint is barred by the statute of limitations. Hallmark moved for summary judgment…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Murphy Oil USA, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2001
- Gaswint v. Primerica Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- United States v. Petroff Trucking CoDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2021