Legal Opinion
Frank Stamato & Co. v. City of New Brunswick
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 7, 1952PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
20 N.J. Super. 340 (1952)
90 A.2d 34
FRANK STAMATO & CO., A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND A. CESTONE COMPANY, A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 26, 1952.
Decided July 7, 1952.
Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and GOLDMANN.
Mr. Peter P. Walsh, Jr., argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Jamieson and Walsh, attorneys).
Mr. John T. Keefe argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.
The opinion of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Phifer v. City of BayonneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1929
- Walter v. McClellanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Fisher v. Borough of LongportSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
3Cited by11 opinions
- Armaniaco v. CresskillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Bryan Const. Co., Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees, of MontclairNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Fereday & Meyer Co., Inc. v. CITY OF ELIZABETH BD., PUBLIC WORKSSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Riverland Const. Co. v. Lombardo Contracting Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- MJ Paquet, Inc. v. Dept. of Transp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.