Legal Opinion

Jones v. Eidem

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 5, 2025No. 4:18-cv-02353Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MARCELLUS A. JONES, No. 4:18-CV-02353 Plaintiff, (Chief Judge Brann) v. EIDEM, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION SEPTEMBER 5, 2025 This is a prisoner civil rights in which I granted judgment to Defendants for Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Plaintiff has filed a motion to alter or amend the judgment. I will deny the motion.1 I. BACKGROUND Pro se Plaintiff Marcellus A. Jones initiated this case through the filing of a civil rights complaint under

42 U.S.C. § 1983

on December 7, 2018.2 On…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Ross v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Banister v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  4. Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Paul Shifflett v. Mr. KorszniakCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API