Legal Opinion

Liebergesell v. Evans

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 21, 1979No. 3697-2PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, C.J.

We granted discretionary review of the denial of the motion by Franklin W. Evans and Donald E. Kotowski for a partial summary judgment against the plaintiff, Virginia Liebergesell. Defendants' motion contended that they were entitled to rely on the defense of usury in plaintiff's action to recover sums of money she had loaned to them, plus interest as stated on the notes given to her by Mr. Kotowski. Although most of the notes carried interest at rates higher than the legal rate of 12 percent, the Superior Court denied summary judgment and ruled that the facts of this case precluded the usury…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Morris v. McNicolWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Adamski v. Tacoma General HospitalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  3. Hafer v. SpaethWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Swenson v. WintercornAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  5. Refrigeration Engineering Co. v. McKayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,445 Kenneth N. Nelson v. O. E. Serwold and Helen Serwold, His WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  2. Dang v. F and S Land Development Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Aetna Finance Co. v. DarwinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  4. Dietz v. Phipps (In Re Sunde)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API