Legal Opinion

Carmell v. Quarterman

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 8, 2008No. 06-40578UnpublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Petitioner-appellant Scott Leslie Car-mell, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Carmell argues that his constitutional rights were violated when the Texas Court of Appeals reaffirmed his convictions on remand from the United States Supreme Court, and that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counsel during those remand proceedings. With respect to his first contention, we affirm the district court’s denial of habeas relief. However, we conclude that Car-mell’s claim of ineffective assistance of appellate…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Carmell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. Carmell, Scott LeslieCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  3. De La Rosa, Javier Jr.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. Michael Don Denton v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2015
  5. Scott Leslie Carmell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API