Legal Opinion

Horn v. Holt

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1904No. 1,798PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Custer County; C. H. Loud, Judge. Action by C. W. Van Horn against John M. Holt and another. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

This is an action on an injunction bond. E. C. Howard commenced an action in the district court against the respondent Van Horn, the only object of which w7as to secure an injunction restraining Van Horn from the commission of certain acts detailed in the complaint in that action. Howard executed an injunction bond in the sum of $300, conditioned as required by law, with the appellants here as sureties. An injunction was issued and served. Van Horn appeared in the 'action, filed an answer denying the allegations of the complaint, and afterwards moved the court to dissolve the injunction. This…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Barney v. VigoreauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Parker v. BondMontana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Curtiss v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Michael v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Milligan v. SaveryMontana Supreme Court · 1886

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yancey v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Hart v. HamraSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Bebee v. JacksonMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Rogers v. RogersMontana Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API