Barton v. Barton

This action was brought by a complaint in two -paragraphs. The first is for money had and received and the second for money loaned to appellant at his instance and request. Each paragraph is based on alleged transactions between appellee and appellant by and through John D. Barton, who, it is claimed by appellee, was the attorney in fact of appellant. The issues were finally joined by an answer in general denial. There was a trial by jury, resulting in a verdict and judgment for appellee in the sum of $1,785.58 and costs. The only error assigned and relied on for reversal is the action of the…