Legal Opinion
Sneyd v. International Paper Co., Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided May 18, 2001No. CIV. 99-40477PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ amended motion for summary judgment [docket entry 47]. The Court has assessed both parties’ submissions and conducted a hearing in open court. For reasons set forth below, the Court grants Defendants’ motion.
I BACKGROUND
On January 12, 1998, Defendant Mead Corporation (“Mead”) hired Plaintiffs to work as account managers for Zellerbach Corporation (“Zellerbach”), which was a division of Mead. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants Mead and Zellerbach had contracted to employ Plaintiffs “for the definite time period of two…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Ovall Dale Kendall v. The Hoover CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Superior Edge, Inc. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2013
- DBI Investments, LLC v. Paul BlavinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Asp v. TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2008
- Gouge v. BAX Global, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
- McClain v. Coverdell & Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.