Legal Opinion

John S. Fairbanks v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 30, 1955No. 12539PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BASTIAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant (defendant) was indicted for the crime of rape on one Bowles, and convicted of the crime of assault with intent to commit rape. His defense was consent on the part of the prosecutrix. The principal ground urged for reversal is based on objections to the admission of certain evidence concerning defendant’s actions prior to the offense charged in the indictment. This evidence was introduced as part of the Government’s case in chief.

The witness Krawczel testified that on the morning of the alleged rape some one who identified himself as Fairbanks rapped at her…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Lovely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  3. Bracey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  4. Greer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. State v. LapageSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1876

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  2. State v. ThomasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. United States v. Nicholas A. StironeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  4. United States v. Cyrus T. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  5. George P. Bradley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API