Legal Opinion
Waste Management of Michigan v. Ingham County
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided July 29, 1996No. 5:94-cv-00094PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEAGUE, District Judge.
This case presents the questions of whether § 13 1 and § 38(6) 2 of Part 115 of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act (the “intercounty waste transportation restrictions”), M.C.L. § 324.11513 and M.C.L. § 324.11538(6), and provisions in the Ingham County Solid Waste Management Plan (the “Ingham County Plan”) restricting transportation of solid waste can withstand Commerce Clause scrutiny. For the reasons discussed below, the Court finds that the intercounty waste transportation restrictions and the Ingham County Plan provisions survive scrutiny…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Green v. MansourSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Solid Wastes Management Ass'n v. Charter County of WayneDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Southern Waste Systems, LLC v. City of Coral SpringsDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2010