Cedar Rapids Steel Transportation, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
District Court, N.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER
Before STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge, and McMAiNUS and HANSON, District Judges. PER CURIAM:
This is an action by plaintiffs seeking to enjoin and set aside orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission (Commission) dated January 17, 1974 and April 3, 1974, denying plaintiffs’ joint application under Section 5 of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 5, and terminating plaintiff Cedar Rapids Steel Transportation, Inc.’s (CRST) temporary authority to lease the operating rights of plaintiff Lee Bros., Inc. (Lee). Pursuant to plaintiffs’ motion filed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Pierce Auto Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Squaw Transit Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1975
- Arkansas-Best Freight System v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1975
- Squaw Transit Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1975