Legal Opinion

Arkansas-Best Freight System v. United States

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided September 2, 1975No. FS-72-C-65PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN E. MILLER, Senior District Judge.

OPINION ON REMAND

Involved in the prior decision of September 11, 1973, of this court, 364 F.Supp. 1239, was the review of orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission (“the Commission”) granting certificates of public convenience and necessity *159to Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc., Johnson Motor Lines, Inc., and Bowman Transportation, Inc. (Bowman). The Commission authorized the named carriers to extend their operations as common carriers of property over specified routes in the southeastern and southwestern portions of the United States.

On November 7, 1972,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. James T. Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  4. Nader v. SawhillTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wing v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983
  2. Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America, Seatrain International S. A., Hapag-Lloyd A. G., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. Fairlane Memorial Convalescent Homes, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1980
  4. Wing v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API