Broder v. Brasselle
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
The plaintiff moves, pursuant to rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to strike the second affirmative defense for insufficiency, or, in the alternative, pursuant to rule 103, to strike the allegations thereof as scandalous, irrelevant and unnecessary. The plaintiff also moves, pursuant to rule 109, for dismissal of the counterclaim for insufficiency.
*14The suit is in two causes of action upon two separate manager-agent contracts, made between the plaintiff’s assignor, a resident of California, and the defendant. Recovery is sought of compensation fixed as alleged at 10% of the defendant’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Zabriskie v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
- Moses v. . McDivittNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Rowell v. . JanvrinNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Ransom v. . CuttingNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- American Optical Co. v. CurtissDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Mesiano v. MazzeoNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Steingold v. Capital Airlines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
- Pugh v. Lu-Kay Holding Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1971
- Steingold v. Capital Airlines, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965