Legal Opinion

Maurice Baskin & Co. v. Howe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 5, 1929PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

By this appeal the appellants seek to review an order denying a motion to strike out an answer and grant judgment for the plaintiffs. The consideration. of that order requires an examination of the question whether alimony awarded by the court to support and maintain a wife and her children may be attached in a proceeding to enforce a judgment obtained against the wife.

In a matrimonial action pending in the Supreme Court, Westchester county, the defendant George Howe was directed to pay $500 per month alimony to his wife, Mary L. Howe, in semimonthly installments of $250 each for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eadie v. . SlimmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Romaine v. . ChaunceyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Guenther v. JacobsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Romaine v. ChaunceyNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Smith v. KaneNew York Court of Chancery · 1830

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Keck v. KeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Conner v. ConnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Balanoff v. NiosiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Glasser v. RogersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
  5. Holt v. CarrNew York Supreme Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API