Legal Opinion

People v. Montague

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1888PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Exceptions from Tuscola. (Beach, J.) Respondent was convicted of adultery. The facts are stated in the opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Respondent was convicted in the circuit court for the county of Tuscola of having, on the 8th day of November, 1887, committed adultery with the wife of Schuyler Arnold. He was, after exceptions had been allowed, admitted to bail, but subsequently sentenced. This sentence we held void, on habeas corpus, as beyond the power of the court at that stage of the proceedings. 70 Mich. 157 (38 N. W. Rep. 15)., The exceptions appear in a somewhat full form, including a history of the proceedings on trial, and on a subsequent motion for a, new trial for improper dealings of the prosecutor during the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re MontagueMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Sunderland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  2. People v. MacCulloughMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. People v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. People v. SchramMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Sorenson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API