Legal Opinion

Licopoli v. New York State Teachers' Retirement System

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 6, 2012Published

1Opinion of the CourtMcCarthy, J.

*1229In petitioner’s case, respondent must determine his retirement benefits based upon a calculation of his final average salary, that is, the actual compensation earned during either the last three or five years of his employment, whichever is higher (see Education Law § 501 [11] [a], [b]; Matter of Cooper v New York State Teachers’ Retirement Sys., 19 AD3d 724, 725 [2005]). To prevent artificial inflation of this figure, any form of extra payment made in anticipation of retirement must be excluded (see Matter of Palandra v New York State Teachers’ Retirement Sys., 84 AD3d 1689, 1690 [2011];…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holbert v. New York State Teachers' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Cooper v. New York State Teachers' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Palandra v. New York State Teachers' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API