Legal Opinion
Shaw Industries, Inc. v. Brett
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Decided November 3, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-510-BPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
POLOZOLA, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment. For the reasons which follow, the Court finds that the defendants’ motion should be granted in part and denied in part.
I. FACTS
On April 14, 1992, Abdulla Ahmed Nass, owner of the Nass Companies Group (“Nass”), obtained the brokerage services of Chris J. Brett (“Brett”) and Comex Services Company (“Comex”) for the sole purpose of locating a potential Joint Venture partner with whom it would establish a company in the Arabian Gulf…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Lavespere v. Niagara Machine & Tool Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Andretti Sports Marketing Louisiana, LLC v. NOLA Motorsports Host Committee, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2015
- Landreneau v. Fleet Financial GroupDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2002
- Cargill, Inc. v. Degesch America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2012
- Hamilton v. Business Partners, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.