Legal Opinion

Einboden v. Martin

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1950No. 5199PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

Plaintiffs- (now appellees) Le Roy S. Martin and Lettie H. Whitcomb, a single woman, filed suit against defendants (now appellants) E, E. Emboden and Dorothy J. Einboden, his wife, and Associated Mining and Milling Company of Nevada, a copartnership, to recover unpaid monthly payments in the aggregate sum of $2,000 allegedly due under the terms of a certain written lease and option agreement. The defendants filed an answer to the complaint together with a motion for summary judgment. This motion was predicated upon the theory that the agreement, above referred to, was an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Egan v. EganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Coombs v. Hibberd.California Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Fiske v. BuderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  5. Oliver v. City of Shattuck Ex Rel. VersluisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. HillArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Smith v. MeyersArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Lone Mountain Ranch, Inc. v. Dillingham Investment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API