Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 2000No. 06A05-0004-PC-149PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION _

ROBB, Judge

Charles Martin appeals from the trial court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief which alleged that his convie-tions for murder and kidnapping violated the Double Jeopardy clauses of the United States and Indiana Constitutions. We affirm.

Issues

Martin raises two issues for our review, which we restate as follows:

1. Whether his convictions for both murder and kidnapping violate the principles of Double Jeopardy; and

2. Whether collateral estoppel requires that his conviction of kidnapping be vacated.

Facts and Procedural History

In 1974, Martin and Lester French…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Harris v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Risner v. Indiana Parole BoardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Weiss v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Lee v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Jessie Hatcher v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Johnathan Olson and Austin J. Mahoney v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API