Legal Opinion
Willingham v. United States
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided February 1, 1991No. CIV-1-89-584PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDGAR, District Judge.
The matter presently before the Court is a motion by defendant United States of America for summary judgment. (Court File No. 15). Plaintiff has not timely filed a response and the Court deems plaintiff to have waived opposition to the motion. Elmore v. Evans, 449 F.Supp. 2 (E.D.Tenn. 1976), aff'd, 577 F.2d 740 (6th Cir.1978) (unpublished per curiam); LR 10.2, EDTN. The Court has carefully reviewed the record and concludes that the motion for summary judgment should be GRANTED under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56.
Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c) provides that summary judgment “shall be…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- William Butler Smith v. Leman HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- 60 Ivy Street Corporation (86-5500), and Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc., (86-5517) v. R.C. Alexander and Doris AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re ShapiroUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Shapiro v. United States Internal Revenue ServiceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995