Legal Opinion
HDT Bio Corp v. Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided November 9, 2022No. 2:22-cv-00334Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 HDT BIO CORP., CASE NO. C22-0334JLR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 12 EMCURE PHARMACEUTICALS, 13 LTD., 14 Defendant. 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the court are: (1) Plaintiff HDT Bio. Corp.’s (“HDT”) motion to compel 17 discovery from Defendant Emcure Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. (“Emcure”) (MTC (Dkt. # 59); 18 MTC Reply (Dkt. # 76)), which Emcure opposes (MTC Resp. (Dkt. # 65)); (2) Emcure’s 19 motion for a protective order limiting the scope of jurisdictional discovery (JDMPO (Dkt. 20 # 63); JDMPO Reply (Dkt. #…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
- Surfvivor Media, Inc. Peter S. Deptula v. Survivor Productions CBS Broadcasting Inc. CBS Worldwide, Inc. Wpc Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Cunningham v. Hamilton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- In Re Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Or.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Hyde & Drath v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.