Legal Opinion

Creamery Package Manufacturing Co. v. Hotsenpiller

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1900No. 3,009PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Prom the Randolph Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenley, J.

This was an action for damages sustained by appellee while a servant in the employ of appellant. The alleged cause of the injury was the defective and unsafe machinery with which appellee was working at the time the injury was received. The complaint is in two para*123graphs. It is averred in each paragraph of the complaint that appellant was negligent, and that appellee was free from contributory negligence, that appellee had no notice or knowledge of the defective and unsafe condition of the appliance with which he was working; but the complaint wholly fails to aver appellant’s knowledge of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. DuelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Ames v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. PearcyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Pennsylvania Co. v. CongdonIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Kentucky & Indiana Bridge Co. v. EastmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SnowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. W. B. Conkey Co. v. LarsenIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Chamberlain v. WaymireIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Norton-Reed Stone Co. v. SteeleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LindsayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API