Legal Opinion

Curtis & Co. Manufacturing Co. v. Douglass & Glass

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1890No. 3171PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Franklin. Tried below before Hon. John L. Sheppard.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

This action originated in a Justice Court, and the statement of the case by counsel for appellant is as follows:

*169Douglass & Glass were indebted to appellant, Curtis & Co. Manufacturing Company, on a note for $166.50, with interest at 8 per cent from 7th of July, 1888.. On the-- day of December, 1888, appellees forwarded by mail to appellant in St. Louis, Missouri, a check for $171.34, drawn by Goudelock & Co., a firm in Mount Vernon, Texas, composed of S. D. Goudelock, on the Mount Vernon Bank, of Mount Vernon, Texas, in favor of appellant, to cover the amount then due…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Brookshire Brothers, Ltd. v. Jerry AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Southland Life Insurance v. GreenwadeTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Pink Front Bankrupt Store v. G. A. Mistrot & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  5. Brookshire Brothers, Ltd. v. Jerry Aldridge, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API