Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Farmers Insurance Co. of Idaho

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1997No. 23251PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This is an insurance bad faith case. We conclude that the trial court correctly ruled that (1) the insurer did not waive its right to demand arbitration under the policy, (2) the insured was not entitled to attorney fees under I.C. § 41-1839, and (3) the insurer was entitled to summary judgment dismissing the insured’s bad faith claim.

I

THE BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Farmers Insurance Company of Idaho (Farmers) insured Virginia E. Anderson (Anderson) under an automobile insurance policy (the policy). In 1992, Anderson was involved in an automobile accident with an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. White v. Unigard Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Brinkman v. Aid Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Hansen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Wolfe v. Farm Bureau InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Halliday v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Robinson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Parsons v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Struhs v. Protection Technologies, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Martin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Vaught v. Dairyland InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API