Legal Opinion
Harold M. Pitman Co. v. Typecraft Software Ltd.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 16, 1986No. 84 C 3028PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
NORDBERG, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion of defendants Typecraft Software, Ltd. (“Typecraft”) and Thomas O’Connor to dismiss this action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction. 1 For the reasons stated below, the court grants defendants’ motion to dismiss.
I. Facts
Plaintiff Harold M. Pitman Company (“Pitman”) is an Illinois corporation with its principal place of business in New Jersey. Pitman distributes, sells and services equipment used in the printing industry.
Typecraft is a company incorporated under…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- O'Hare International Bank, a National Banking Association v. Berlon E. HamptonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of MarinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Radosta v. Devil's Head Ski LodgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- IDS Life Insurance v. SunAmerica, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Lockert v. BreedloveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Scholz Research and Development, Inc. v. KurzkeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.