Legal Opinion

Hoban v. Ryder

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1932No. Docket No. 132, Calendar No. 36,092PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

Marion Hoban and her husband, Edward Hoban, are the respective plaintiffs in two suits which have been consolidated after being begun against Charles Byder, defendant. Charles Byder died after the suits were begun, and the Equitable & Central Trust Company, as administrator of his estate, was also joined as a party defendant. Byder’s death was in no way related to the automobile accident, the cause of the present litigation.

Mrs. Hoban was a guest passenger of Bertha Solomon, and, on the. 5th day of July, 1927, started out with her for Ann Arbor, Michigan. They rode in Mrs. Solomon’s Buick…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rockwell v. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Berry v. WhitneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. O'Neil v. Lake Superior Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Porth v. Cadillac Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Barriger v. ZieglerMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Willis v. Total Health Care of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Gayden v. ArabaisMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Stewart v. EldredMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. In Re Clark's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Hoban v. Equitable & Central Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API