Asbury v. Charlotte Electric Railway & Power Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil ActioN for damages for personal injury received by fame plaintiff, while a passenger, by tbe negligence of defendant, tried before Goble, Jand a jury, at Eall Term, 1899, of MecKI/eNbueg Superior Court. There was no exception to the evidence. The exceptions to «the charge of his Honor are noted in the opinion. Verdict for the plaintiff for $2,500. Judgment. Appeal by defendant.
1Opinion of the Court
Montgomery, .7.
This action was brought by the feme plaintiff to recover damages for injuries received by her, and alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. The particular allegation of the complaint is that the feme plaintiff was a passenger on one of the street cars of the defendant, and while she was in, the act of disembarking therefrom, the servants and agents of the defendant, in charge of said car, negligently caused the ear to be suddenly started forward, and that the said plaintiff, in consequence thereof, was thrown to the ground and injured.
The defendant denied…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Hodges v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- State v. Clark.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Hayes v. MoultonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Hodges v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Allgood v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.