Legal Opinion

Kimble v. BHM Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 8, 1989No. A89A1479PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Judge.

Plaintiff/appellant Richard Kimble instituted the present action against defendant/appellee BHM Construction Company, Inc. (hereinafter BHM) under a theory of respondeat superior for injuries he received while delivering materials to a construction site on which BHM was constructing a house. As alleged in plaintiff’s complaint, a saw horse thrown off the roof by one of the carpenters framing the house landed on him causing him serious injury. Defendant subsequently filed a motion for summary judgment, contending that the carpenters were independent contractors, not employees, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Mason v. GraceyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  4. Farmers Mutual Exchange of Commerce, Inc. v. SiskCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  5. Piggly Wiggly Southern, Inc. v. Hercules, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bellsouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. HeltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. Tuggle v. BurpeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. CAJUN CONTRACTORS, INC. v. PEACHTREE PROPERTY SUB, LLC D/B/A CROWNE PLAZA HOTEL ATLANTA-MIDTOWNCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021
  4. CASTLEBERRY v. THOMASDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2020
  5. PINDER v. LANCER INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API