Blue Movies, Inc. v. Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government
Kentucky Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceVenters, J.
While I am in full agreement with the conclusions reached by the well-reasoned majority opinion, I write separately to more fully address the provision exclusively relied upon by Appellants in support of their constitutional claims, Section 1(4) of the Kentucky Constitution. Appellants make no federal First Amendment claims, and seek only to have their arguments addressed on state constitutional grounds.1 Indeed, the Federal District Court,'following removal by Metro, dismissed this very litigation from its docket for lack of jurisdiction on the basis that Appellants raised no federal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Minnesota v. National Tea Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Pap's A.M. v. City of ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. WassonKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.