Legal Opinion

Theis v. Abduloor

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1988No. Docket 101539PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals from an order granting defendant summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(8) on the ground that as a matter of law defendant did not owe plaintiff a duty to protect her as a business invitee from injuries inflicted by unknown third-party criminal actors who "mugged” her. We affirm.

On July 5, 1985, after plaintiff left defendant’s store in Detroit and was proceeding to her car, she was attacked and mugged by two people who held her, hit her over the head and dragged her across the parking lot. It was plaintiff’s contention that defendant had reason to know or should have…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. Cunningham Drug Stores, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  2. McNeal v. HenryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Marr v. YousifMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Rodis v. Herman Kiefer HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Locklear v. StinsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bailey v. SchaafMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Scott v. Harper Recreation, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Holland v. LiedelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Tame v. a L Damman Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Bailey v. SchaafMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API