Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Bache

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 29, 1944No. Appeals, 291 and 292PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Maxey,

This is an appeal from the judgment of the Superior Court, in a Workmen’s Compensation case. The question is: Was the deceased husband of claimant at the time he met with a fatal accident “an independent contractor” or “an employee?” The Eeferee found that the deceased was the former, the Compensation Board found that he was the latter, the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County affirmed the Board, and the Superior Court reversed the Court of Common Pleas. The facts in this case are few and no one of them is conclusive. The decision must depend on the facts…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Simonton v. MortonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Paulin v. Williams Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Williamson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Venezia v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Smith v. State Workmen's Insurance FundSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. JOHNSON v. ANGRETTISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Diehl v. Keystone Alloys Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Lorigan v. W. O. Gulbranson, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Cookson v. KnauffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Potash v. BonaccursoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API