Legal Opinion
United States v. Lillibridge
District Court, S.D. California
Decided December 13, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCORMICK, District Judge.
This is a suit in equity for a perpetual injunction to restrain defendants from mining on certain land included within the San Bernardino National Forest. A temporary injunction forbidding mining on the property in controversy pendente lite was issued by Judge Hazel after a full hearing in court. The areas involved are not part of the public domain. They have been set apart and reserved from settlement for forest usages by presidential proclamation. See 26 Stat. 1103, and 27 Stat. 1049 and 1068.
The Secretary of Agriculture, under the authority of congressional act of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cameron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Cole v. RalphSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Chrisman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Diamond Coal & Coke Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Steele v. Tanana Mines R.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ford M. Converse v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States Ex Rel. United States Borax Co. v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- United States v. MobleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1942
- Palmer v. Dredge Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. TooleDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.