La Bonte Ransom Co., Inc. v. Scellars
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HAZLETT, J., pro tem.
In this case defendant failed to answer within the time allowed by law after service of the summons and complaint, his default was taken and judgment was entered against him pursuant thereto. He moved to have the default judgment set aside under the provisions of section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure, on the ground of mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect, which motion was denied, and he appeals.
The appeal was made pursuant to the alternative method provided for.in sections 953a, 953b, and 953c of the Code of Civil Procedure, but appellant did not print in his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dahlberg v. DahlbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Bailiff v. HildebrandtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Corgiat v. Realty Mortgage Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Furlong v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Hille v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
3Cited by5 opinions
- Daniels v. DanielsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Sousa v. Capital Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Boris v. BorisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Vernon v. DeesyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Vernon v. DeesyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932