Furlong v. Alexander
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
This is an action to recover on two promissory notes. Plaintiff had judgment and defendants appeal. It is contended that the amount of the judgment should be reduced in the sum of $151.23, for the reason that the trial court erred in the computation of the interest due upon the notes and by that means rendered judgment for a sum which was in excess of the amount actually due to the extent stated. In arguing their contention appellants say that the total amount of the judgment was $3,229.63, giving the items which together go to make up the total. They then assert that the aggregate sum should…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by2 opinions
- La Bonte Ransom Co., Inc. v. ScellarsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Hille v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927