Legal Opinion

Nyland v. Moore

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 30, 2000No. 99-2402PublishedCited by 142 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Jeffrey F. Nyland appeals the district court’s denial of his pro se 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition as time barred. Nyland argues that the district court erred when it failed to find that the filing date of his instant § 2254 petition related back to the date he timely filed his first § 2254 petition, which was dismissed without prejudice, and also erred when it failed to treat his state motions for post-conviction relief as pending until the mandates issued. Moreover, Nyland argues, for the first time on appeal, that his § 2254 petition was timely because the statute of limitations…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Martinez-VillarealSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Ronald Jones v. Willis Morton, Warden of Trenton State Prison Attorney General of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  3. Webster v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Wilcox v. Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Bernard Depree v. A.G. Thomas, Warden and Michael J. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by142 opinions

  1. Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Carey v. SaffoldSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Access Now, Inc. v. Southwest Airlines Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Marsh v. SoaresCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. Gibson v. KlingerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API