Legal Opinion

Simeone v. Zoning Bd. of Adj.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 17, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

873 A.2d 571 (2005)

377 N.J. Super. 417

Christopher SIMEONE and Eleanor Braun, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF the TOWNSHIP OF EAST HANOVER, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 18, 2004.

Decided February 17, 2005.

Carmine D. Campanile, Livingston, argued the cause for appellants (Commisa & Campanile, attorneys; Mr. Campanile, on the brief).

Vincent A. Pirone, Bloomfield, argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges CUFF, WEISSBARD and HOENS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

CUFF, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Christopher Simeone is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Cell South of NJ, Inc. v. ZONING BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OF WEST WINDSOR TWP.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
  3. New Brunswick Cellular Telephone Co. v. Borough of South Plainfield Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  4. Bressman v. GashSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  5. Lang v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Darst v. BLAIRSTOWN TP. ZONINGNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API