Legal Opinion

United States v. Tyndale

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided September 29, 1999No. NMCM 97 01741PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEO, Senior Judge:

The appellant was tried before a special court-martial composed of officer members and was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of wrongful use of methamphetamine, in violation of Article 112a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 912a (1994). He was sentenced to reduction to pay grade E-3 and a bad-conduct discharge. The convening authority approved the sentence as adjudged.

We have carefully examined the record of trial, the appellant’s five assignments of error,1 and the Government’s response. We conclude that the assignments of error are without merit, the findings…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. SchefferSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. United States v. SnellingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. HealyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. TyndaleCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
  2. United States v. DoughmanNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
  3. United States v. TyndaleCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API