Legal Opinion

Sunbeam Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 21, 1969No. C.D. 3794Published

1Opinion of the Court

Kosenstein, Judge:

Plaintiff claims herein that certain merchandise, invoiced as soleplate and switch assemblies,1 which was classified as manufactures in chief value of aluminum, not specially *435provided for, under paragraph 397, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 54108, and assessed with duty thereunder at 19 per centum ad valorem, is properly classifiable under paragraph 353 of said act, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 52739, as articles…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lodge Spark Plug Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. Bruce Duncan Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  3. William Adams, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  5. Ronco Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API