Legal Opinion
Hairston v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided June 29, 2011No. 11-136CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*697 OPINION AND ORDER
WHEELER, Judge.
Plaintiff Arthur L. Hairston, Sr. filed a pro se Complaint on March 4, 2011, and an Amended Complaint on April 4,2011, naming as defendants the United States, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (FBOP), and various officials from the federal correctional institutions where Mr. Hairston has been incarcerated. (Compl. ¶ 1, Mar. 4, 2011; Am. Compl. ¶¶ 1-23, Apr. 4, 2011.) Mr. Hairston has asserted claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b) (FTCA), and claims based upon the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Bivens v. Six…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gloria Treviño, Individually and as Next Friend for Robert Rodriguez Treviño v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Kortlander v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Coelho v. ChalasDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Erickson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015