Legal Opinion

People v. Wrighton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 24, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant argues that he was constitutionally entitled to a jury trial on the attempted sexual misconduct charge, even though it is a class B misdemeanor carrying a maximum sentence of 90 days, because the added consequence of registration as a sex offender allegedly takes the crime out of the petty offense category. However, at trial defendant raised a completely different argument, in which he made the unavailing (see People v Urbaez, 10 NY3d 773 [2008]) claim that the People’s reduction of the original class A misdemeanor charges to attempts violated his right to a jury trial. Accordingly,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. People v. GravinoNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. People v. UrbaezNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. People v. FoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. Carlos D.G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. People v. Carlos D.G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  3. People v. Brodeur (Christopher)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API