People v. Wrighton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Defendant argues that he was constitutionally entitled to a jury trial on the attempted sexual misconduct charge, even though it is a class B misdemeanor carrying a maximum sentence of 90 days, because the added consequence of registration as a sex offender allegedly takes the crime out of the petty offense category. However, at trial defendant raised a completely different argument, in which he made the unavailing (see People v Urbaez, 10 NY3d 773 [2008]) claim that the People’s reduction of the original class A misdemeanor charges to attempts violated his right to a jury trial. Accordingly,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- People v. GravinoNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. UrbaezNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. FoyNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. Carlos D.G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. Carlos D.G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. Brodeur (Christopher)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2019