Legal Opinion

Mistone v. Holzman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 18, 1953Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Defendants-respondents agreed to sell their house to appellant, title to close December 1, 1952, later adjourned to December 3, 1952. The contract contained no express provision making time of the essence. The closing did not take place as scheduled, due, it is alleged, to appellant’s financial inability at that time. On December 13, 1952, defendants-respondents agreed to sell the property to plaintiffs-respondents at a substantially lower price, title to close December 29, 1952. That closing did not occur, due to the fact that appellant had filed a Us pendens against the premises on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Di Menna v. . Cooper Evans Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Dresdner v. Goldman Sachs Trading Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  3. Goss v. C. S. Goss & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  4. Crandall v. A. B. Leach & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  5. Samuel Strauss & Co. v. American Credit Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API