Legal Opinion

Samuel Strauss & Co. v. American Credit Indemnity Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 17, 1922PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Page, J.:

The action is at law to recover upon a policy of credit insurance issued to the individual defendants and by them assigned, with the consent of the corporation defendant, to the plaintiff. The complaint sets forth facts which more briefly stated are as follows:

The individual defendants were copartners in business, and the corporation defendant issued to them a policy of credit insurance, whereby, in consideration of the payment of the premium therein specified, and upon the terms and conditions therein set forth, the corporation defendant insured the individual defendants against…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Smith v. Western Pacific Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Goss v. C. S. Goss & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  4. City of New York v. MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  5. Brody, Adler & Koch Co. v. HochstadterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fulmer v. SovocoolAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  2. Menado Corp. v. Indemnity Insurance of North AmericaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1967
  3. Kye v. StearnsNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Joray Realty Co. v. SteinbergCity of New York Municipal Court · 1927
  5. Taylor v. L. C. Smith & Corona Typewriters, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API