Legal Opinion

Casey v. Truss

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 1986No. 85CA0132PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge.

Plaintiff, John Casey, a Colorado resident, appeals the judgment of the trial court dismissing his complaint against David Truss on the basis of forum non conveniens. Defendant, David Truss, claims to be a resident of Alaska. The trial court found he had been properly served with process in Colorado. Defendant has abandoned his cross-appeal challenging the propriety of this ruling. We reverse.

Plaintiff moved to Alaska in 1979 and lived there for eighteen months. According to his complaint, while he was living in Alaska he was hired by the defendant to perform certain services for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. LohnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  2. State, Department of Highways v. District Court ex rel. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Crane on Behalf of Cook v. MakelburgColorado Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sabino v. RuffoloConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  2. Taylor v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. UIH-SFCC Holdings, L.P. v. BrigatoColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Cox v. Sage Hospitality Resources, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Firelock Inc. v. District Court in & for the 20th Judicial District of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API