Legal Opinion

Bayly v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 7, 1943No. 45563PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadden, Judge

Plaintiff was a Civil Service employee of the Government from October 1, 1917, until he retired on September 30, 1939. An act making provision for a retirement allowance, or annuity, for such employees, became effective in 1920.1 The amount of one’s annuity depended in part upon the' number of years of his service. Betirement at the age of 70 was compulsory, except under circumstances not here present.

The Civil Service Commission issued to plaintiff, upon his retirement, a certificate which computed plaintiff’s annuity at $682.80 per year, which amount was based on the Commission’s finding…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Nevada Consolidated Copper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Dismuke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Silberschein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Washington, Virginia & Maryland Coach Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Lloyd Sabaudo Societa Anonima Per Azioni v. EltingSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Morelli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  2. Richard L. Schlegel v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  3. Croghan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  4. Carlin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  5. Brownfield v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API