Legal Opinion

Gross v. Newburger, Loeb & Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1980PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Beatrice S. Burstein, J.

Plaintiffs’ motion for an order granting leave to reargue and renew, and for reconsideration, and the motion by defendants Newburger Loeb & Co., Inc. (the corporation), Newburger, Loeb & Co. (the partnership), Robert L. Newburger, Andrew M. Newburger, John F. Settel, Sanford Roggenburg, Richard D. Stern, Harold J. Richards, Robert L. Stern, and Richard D. Stern, Walter D. Stern and Robert L. Stern, as executors of the estate of Leo Stern (the Newburger defendants) for reconsideration, are consolidated for purposes of determination. Leave is granted,…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Board of Education v. Farmingdale Classroom Teachers Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Williams v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Burt v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. 219 Broadway Corp. v. Alexander's, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1979

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Au v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Demalco Ltd. v. FeltnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  3. Process & Storage Vessels, Inc. v. Tank Service, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1982
  4. Derry Finance N v. v. Christiana Companies, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1985
  5. Gross v. Newburger, Loeb & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API