Legal Opinion

Smith v. Norton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 25, 1952No. 34782PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

In plaintiff’s action for partition of real estate commissioners were duly appointed who made report that the land could not be divided among the various owners thereof, or that partition in kind could not be made without manifest injury to each of the parties owning interests therein, and they reported their appraisement of the fair value of the land involved.

Plaintiff, the undisputed owner of an undivided one-half interest in the land, preferred partition in kind and filed her objections to the commissioners’ report. One of the three commissioners was of the view that the land might be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. StanfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Hargis v. HargisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Wilkerson v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Sting v. BeckhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Crabtree v. Standard Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Diehl v. HieronymusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  2. Carr v. HardenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API