Salt Lake City v. Allred
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TUCKETT, Justice.
The defendant was charged with a violation of Sec. 32-2-1, Revised Ordinances of Salt Lake City, 1965. The defendant was convicted in the City Court and thereafter *256appealed to the District Court. From a verdict of guilty after trial in the District Court, the defendant has appealed to this Court claiming that the ordinance under which she was charged is invalid and unconstitutional.
The defendant was charged with aiding .and abetting an act prohibited by Subsection 7 of the ordinance above referred to. 'The provisions of that section are as •follows:
Direct or offer to direct…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Salt Lake City v. SutterUtah Supreme Court · 1923
- Wadsworth v. Santaquin CityUtah Supreme Court · 1933
- American Fork City v. RobinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1930
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1878
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. HutchinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1971
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1971
- Salt Lake City v. AllredUtah Supreme Court · 1968
- Salt Lake City v. AllredUtah Supreme Court · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.