Foster v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Mobley, Chief Justice.
William Foster appeals from his conviction and sentence for the offense of armed robbery, and from the denial of his motion for new trial, which was on the usual general grounds.
1. The first enumerated error is that the court erred in denying the appellant’s motion for new trial without a hearing. It is asserted that this ruling denied him his constitutional right to notice and an opportunity to be heard.
The appellant was jointly indicted with Samuel Shockley. See Shockley v. State, 230 Ga. 869, ante. The. same contention was made in the Shockley case as in the present…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shockley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Shurley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dick v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Peyton v. PeytonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
- Gantt v. SweatmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Wright v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.