Legal Opinion

Moody v. Vans Gila Gin Company

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1961No. 7228PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOCKWOOD, Justice.

Petitioner seeks by certiorari to restrain' the Industrial Commission, respondent herein, from exceeding its jurisdiction by denying his Petition and Application for Rehearing on the sole ground that it was; not timely filed. Rule 37 of the Industrial' Commission provides, inter alia, that any party aggrieved by an award of the Commission may file, within 20 days after service of the award, written Notice of Protest which stays the award from becoming final. The rule further provides that such aggrieved party has 20 additional days from-the date of filing the Notice of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. S.H. Kress Co. v. Superior Court of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Narramore v. Fannin's Gas & Equipment CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hawkinson Tire Co. v. Paul E. Hawkinson Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Apodaca v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. Texas Independent Oil Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API